BISHOPНе согласен с Лизардом по поводу пересмотра системы рейтинга
1) Игра на шаблоне Г+У идет в любом случае дольше по времени
2) Идет доп. популизацая не востребованного ранее размера карты
3) я уверен что можно сыграть 2 игры на зеркале или джебе в то же время как и одну Г+У и получить такое же количество поинтов.
По сему считаю, формула на данный момент корректна

p.s. Костя мы сейчас не говорим о балансе и скиловости, мы говорим о другом формате ,другой стратегии и никто не заставляет никого играть в монетку.

1) I took a quick look at your twitch vods and out of 20 streams the longest G+U game took you ~5 hours to finish and the fastest one was ~2h, i'd say the average would be 4h or so. I think we all know how long it takes to finish an average XL+U or H3dm game, so what you're claiming is complete nonsense.
2) This argument is also nonsense, why should the devs forcefully try to popularize what is frankly completely unsuited for competitive games by awarding additional rating points? People are going to play what they want to play, if the bonus rating points are the main reason why you keep playing on this map size then maybe G+U isn't that great ) It just artificially inflates rating for no actual reason.
3) https://puu.sh/EaYBb/7ac1bee39c.png - a random example from heroes.3tv
6 hours, 2 games, +150 points. Good luck getting anywhere close to that number on jebus, mirror, or whatever you want really. How are these fluctuations of rating even remotely healthy for the scene? You can jump 300 points in as much as 5 games, it's completely ridiculous.